
Photo by Rich Schmitt, Staff Photographer
Pacific Palisades homeowners lambasted the City of L.A.’s lack of law enforcement concerning Building and Safety orders at last Thursday’s Community Council meeting. Rustic Canyon residents appeared before the council to complain that Building and Safety is not enforcing its control over a corner residence at 909 Greentree, the home of Mehr and Vickey Beglari. The house is 14 feet closer to the street than permitted by the Los Angeles Municipal Code, and last December the State Court of Appeal ordered Building and Safety to revoke the permits issued to the Beglaris for the completed addition to their home as well as their certificate of occupancy. However, while Building and Safety revoked the Beglaris’ certificate of occupancy as well as their main permits in May, neighbors argue that nobody has ordered the Beglaris to vacate their home or make their house comply with the Code. “This case has been adjudicated,” said Randy Young, a local resident and longtime community activist. “The court has said the City of Los Angeles is not doing its job.” He called the City’s unwillingness to act “cultivated ignorance” and said, “they have worked at being incompetent.” The main issue of the dispute is whether the front-yard setback was calculated correctly, and whether the Beglaris must now lop 14 feet off the entire front of their two-story house to meet the setback requirement of 27 feet. Vickey Beglari told the council, “The City throughout this whole process has said that we’ve done nothing wrong, that we’ve complied with this whole process. There have been mistakes, and we’ve responded to them.” Mehr Beglari said that “the City stopped our job three times to check and recheck all our plans, to make sure we were in compliance.” Vickey added, “Our property is large but it’s not that large compared with other homes in the Rustic Canyon area.” She noted that “the appellate court said the goal was not to tear down the home, but to make sure the City complies with the error.” By the “error,” Vickey was referring to the disputed calculation. Council member Steve Boyers expressed confusion about what the Beglaris wanted the council to do about their current situation, seeing that the case has already been adjudicated. “There are alternatives to tearing down the home,” Vickey said. “We’re still looking into other alternatives to make this right.” Asked after the meeting what some of those alternatives are, she declined to discuss that with the Palisadian-Post. Rustic Canyon resident and attorney Ronald Oster, one of the six plaintiffs in the case against the Beglaris, spoke on behalf of the group and requested that the council write letters to Building and Safety and the City Council asking them to enforce the law. “I’m asking for the support of this community,” Oster said. “You have a judgment. This is a clear-cut case. The certificate of occupancy has been revoked and the building cannot be inhabited.” After hearing from both sides, the council voted that chairman Kurt Toppel write letters “to any and all people to get the City to enforce the law.” Meanwhile, the Beglaris have started construction on a second property they purchased in early 2004 at 921 Greentree, just down the street from their disputed residence. For a year, next-door neighbor Sue Toigo has been concerned about a cluster of eucalyptus trees on the Beglari property that hang dangerously low over her own property. She has previously discussed the problem with Mehr Beglari and trimmed two of the trees over her roof at her own expense. Toigo’s concern for “the safety of my family and home” grew in recent weeks as the Beglaris began excavating their property, which compromised the roots of the trees. On Tuesday, she approached Beglari about the problem and he suggested that she call the City Street Tree Division, which she did. Jerome Washington, a supervisor with the Street Tree Division who visited the site shortly after Toigo’s call, told the Palisadian-Post that he determined that “the trees have to be removed at the owner’s expense,” and if they’re not removed, “it’s a public hazard.” Toigo wrote a letter to Beglari on Tuesday stating, “Now that the City has determined that the excavation of some of the trees in your backyard at 921 Greentree has rendered them unsafe and that they must be taken down, I hope they can be removed quickly… “As neighbor to neighbor, I respectfully ask that you not let any quarrel you might have with the City authorities delay the tree removal which could jeopardize my family’s safety.” Beglari did not answer a telephone call from the Palisadian-Post that afternoon, before our Wednesday morning deadline.