Home Blog Page 2278

Foreclosure Sale: Rescuing a Canyon Gem

This Country English-style house on Entrada Drive in Santa Monica Canyon was bought in foreclosure in 1993--during the last real estate bust--and restored. It was originally part of the Marion Davis estate and designed by architect Julia Morgan.
This Country English-style house on Entrada Drive in Santa Monica Canyon was bought in foreclosure in 1993–during the last real estate bust–and restored. It was originally part of the Marion Davis estate and designed by architect Julia Morgan.

It was a foreclosure on Entrada Drive that initially peaked my interest in Santa Monica Canyon, where I currently reside. While there were a considerable number of foreclosed properties on the market during the last real estate bust –which included the fall of 1993 when I was house hunting–none of them seemed as special or affordable as this one. From the research I had done (this being my second foreclosure) I discovered the house on Entrada indeed had a history, a pedigree and it was half a block from the beach, which I knew would add considerably to its value. Never mind that the property was completely derelict, on a busy street and abutted the canyon’s commercial area. No, I did not bid for the property at a public auction held on the courthouse steps, which is one-way foreclosures, are sold. In fact, the purchase was done, well, the usual way. A Westside real estate agent who knew I was looking for another investment property listed the house, which had been repossessed by the bank when the owner failed to make the monthly payments. The agent pointed out that the Bank of Chicago, which now owned the house, had listed it well below market value mainly because it was not familiar with real estate values in L.A.–even declining ones–and just wanted to recoup what it could as quickly as possible. The only condition of the sale was that the property had to be bought ‘as is’ and there would be no opportunity to inspect the house prior to the close of escrow. With limited funds at the time, I wondered how else I could possibly own such a trophy property except through a market opportunity such as this. So on the advice of the agent, I made a nearly full price offer–and to my surprise, it was accepted. However, it would be almost three months before I could take possession. During that time I visited the site almost daily. I could see that the grand two-story mansion, which was barely visible from the street because of the overgrown foliage, was really big–so big, in fact, that it spread out over two lots that straddled the corner, a sharp contrast to the four, single-story beach bungalows down the block. While some of the windows were bordered up, I knew the house was occupied, with people coming and going at all hours of the day and night. The parking area was always crammed with dated vehicles and old motorcycles. As I walked up and down the street, I fantasized about what I would do with the storied mansion, which apparently had nine bedrooms, each with its own bath. I was told by neighbors that the house, which had once been part of the Marion Davies estate half a mile away on PCH, was moved to its current location in 1959 when the estate was torn down to make way for a beach parking lot. Rumor has it that the house was moved in three separate parts and reassembled on the Entrada site. However, the house had to be turned around so that the picture windows in the living room would face the garden instead of the neighboring parking lot. The house was once one of four guesthouses on the former Davies estate, which included a 110-room main house where newspaper publisher William Randolph Hearst and Davies were known to entertain a great deal–mostly big Hollywood stars like Charlie Chaplin and Katherine Hepburn. Architect Julia Morgan, who designed Hearst Castle in San Simeon, also designed this distinctive Country English-style house. What was left of her design inside, I wondered? I would soon find out. At the time the property was foreclosed on it had become a derelict rooming house. On the December morning escrow closed, the county sheriff was there to escort the remaining tenants out. The locks were changed and I was handed the keys. What I remember most on that first visit was the orange carpet on the staircase. While the mantel around the fireplace in the living room was gone, there were still embers burning and beds all over the room. Half of the toilets didn’t work. Neither did the two furnaces or the dishwasher. It took a month just to get rid of the debris–from the foil wallpaper in the bathrooms (so popular in the 1950s) to the ceilings that suffered from water damage (mostly from leaky pipes), to the rusty motorcycle parts buried in the yard (remnants of a once thriving business?). In this house even the two maids’ rooms each had their own bathroom, and while the kitchen was exceptionally small I could see there was a way to double the size–by integrating the butler’s pantry, putting a six-foot commercial stove where the washer and dryer used to be, and punching out the wall to the hall which instantly gave us much more space. While many of the architectural features had obviously been pillaged over the years, on almost all of the interior doors I found the reminders of Morgan’s legacy that I was looking for–crystal doorknobs that sparkled in the light. Also intact were some of the original crown moldings, the mirrored staircase that cried out for a skylight, and the cast-iron railings. Looking closely, I could see the daisies Morgan designed on each bar. Enamored with my finds, I embarked on a renovation that was complete in 100 days. My goal was simple: to bring the house (4,500-sq.-ft. on a 7,500-sq.-ft. lot) back to its original beauty and sell it for a profit. It would be marketed as having four private suites plus a large master suite with his-and-her baths (unusual at the time), an upstairs family room and deck with ocean view, a doggy run, an outdoor shower, two gardens and parking for six cars–a big plus in the canyon where it is hard to find a parking spot in front of your own home, especially on weekends because of the beach traffic. However, just before putting the house on the market I decided to spend July 4th weekend there, just to see what it was like. Fourteen years later I am still here. Wonder what happened to the previous owner who lost the house in foreclosure? I think he spent too much time at the racetrack. One day when the workers opened the ceiling in one of the bedrooms upstairs it started to ‘rain.’ Hundreds and hundreds of stubs poured through the rafters from the attic up above–stubs from Hollywood Park. Unfortunately, his wagers on the horses didn’t pay off for him.

Thinking of Remodeling Without a Permit?

Technically, the City of Los Angeles requires that homeowners obtain a building permit before making property improvements that cost $500 or more.
Technically, the City of Los Angeles requires that homeowners obtain a building permit before making property improvements that cost $500 or more.
Photo by Linda Renaud

By MICHAEL EDLEN Special to the Palisadian-Post It can happen so easily. You decide to remodel your bathroom. You find a contractor who says he will do all the work according to code. To save time and money you don’t get a permit from the City of Los Angeles to complete the work. What are the risks involved? Technically, the city requires that homeowners obtain a building permit before making property improvements that cost $500 or more. Although I do not know many building code provisions, I am aware that they are extremely detailed and have heard that projects are often delayed for many days while waiting for inspectors to come out and approve the work in process. In order for homeowners to receive a permit, they or their representative must file plans and pay a fee to the city. The inspection process may be inconvenient as well as taking extra time, and those reasons are why many homeowners do remodeling without using the permit process. Others do such work with unlicensed contractors in an effort to avoid extra costs and time altogether. There are some potential risks in doing non-permitted work. For example, if the city discovers this later, getting the work permitted can cost far more and involve challenges that would not have been involved if the permit had been obtained at the start. If the work was not done according to code or if the inspector cannot tell if the work was done properly, the homeowner may need to have walls or floors opened up to enable the inspection. I recall one home being sold in the Palisades where an entire room had been added without a permit. This was discovered during an escrow inspection, and it required several months to re-build with the correct type of electric wiring and proper spacing of studs in the walls. The seller tried to simply give a credit to the buyer, but the buyer’s insurance company noted that if a fire started in that part of the home the company would not pay for the losses. Thus, the seller had to absorb the costs of correcting the work, or risking losing the escrow. In addition, by California law, a seller must disclose any non-permitted work to any prospective buyer. This could lead to some discount in sale price, require the seller to do costly and time-consuming repairs before the escrow closes, or possibly cause an escrow to fall out. We recently sold a home where the seller had put up a low retaining wall without completing the permit process. The work was properly done and nearly all in accordance with building code provisions. However, the buyer was not willing to close escrow until a permit had been properly processed to completion. It cost the seller thousands of dollars and several weeks of delays to rush through all of the necessary steps. As that seller sadly concluded, if he had known how much stress he and the buyer would have over this, he would have endured the city bureaucracy and added costs of time and money in the beginning. The far greater costs at the end were clearly not worth it. In the future he will be sure that any contractor does all his work under the permit process. (Editor’s note: Michael Edlen is a realtor with Coldwell Banker in Pacific Palisades. Information on building permits can be obtained from the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety by visiting www.ladbs.org or going to its Westside office at 1828 Sawtelle Blvd., on the second floor.)

View Rights Under Assault In Palisades Neighborhoods

The Zabrucky family, who have lived on Turquesa Lane in Marquez Knolls since 1993, stand in front of the McAdams residence, which is now partially blocking their ocean view.
The Zabrucky family, who have lived on Turquesa Lane in Marquez Knolls since 1993, stand in front of the McAdams residence, which is now partially blocking their ocean view.

By KEITH TURNER Special to the Palisadian-Post Pacific Palisades is a special place, tucked between the ocean and mountains, where many homeowners enjoy sweeping views of Santa Monica Bay, the shoreline, canyons and dramatic, undeveloped mountain landscapes. Anthony Marguleas, president of Amalfi Estates on Sunset, has commented that a good ocean view can increase a property’s value by $500,000 or more, depending on the quality or type of view. Several Palisades neighborhoods have special view sections, such as the Asilomar/El Medio bluffs area, Sunset Mesa, Castellemmare (“Castle by the Sea”) and parts of Marquez Knolls. However, many homeowners are finding that their view rights are being attacked by new home construction and major remodeling projects. Many people who purchase homes with views believe that their view rights are protected as a matter of law. They believe that neighboring property owners cannot construct an addition or allow their landscaping to grow that would impair their views. However, currently there is no federal, state, or local law that generally protects the treasured view rights of Palisades property owners. Although City Councilman Bill Rosendahl announced a year ago that Los Angeles should have a view protection ordinance, arguing that municipalities such as Rancho Palos Verdes, Sausalito and Tiburon have had view rights ordinances for years. But at this time, there appear to be strong political forces against enacting a view rights law in Los Angeles. In the absence of government protection, American ‘common law’ provides that as a general rule, a landowner has no natural right to air, light, or an unobstructed view. The courts have generally refused to tamper with the American ‘common law’ view on the grounds that it is ‘solely within the province of the legislature to gauge the relative importance of social policies and decide whether to effect a change in the law.’ (Sher v. Leiderman (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 867, 878.) Without governmental or common-law protection, many homeowners believe that their CC&Rs protect their view rights because they contain express language concerning view rights. A reasonable layperson’s reading of many of the CC&Rs in effect in Sunset Mesa, Castellammare, Marquez Knolls and elsewhere, would support that interpretation. However, the law regarding CC&Rs is not as clear as many homeowners assume. When disputes have erupted between property owners, the courts generally struggled how to apply the CC&Rs. The California Supreme Court has even stated that CC&R-related law is the ” the most complex and archaic body of American property law remaining in the twentieth century.” (Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. Anderson, 1996, 12 Cal.4th 345, 348 (citation omitted.) Law professor and author Edward Rabin uses stronger language: ‘The law in this area is an unspeakable quagmire.’ Currently, there are at least five separate lawsuits involving disputes related to view rights and CC&R’s in the Palisades. The view rights provided by the CC&Rs for Marquez Knolls has been the subject of two published Court of Appeal decisions and there is currently another appeal pending regarding those CC&Rs. The Court of Appeal’s decision in the pending appeal in the Zabrucky v. McAdams case could impact all of the pending litigation. The Zabrucky v. McAdams case was brought in 2001 by John Zabrucky and Jalene Zabrucky, homeowners in the Marquez Knolls area, to enforce the CC&Rs, which included the following provision: “No’structures [shall be] erected that may at present or in the future obstruct the view from any other lot ” (Marquez Knolls CC&Rs, No. 11). Specifically at issue was a neighbor’s planned 2,100-sq.ft. addition to their existing house which, according to the Zabruckys, obstructed and detracted from their view of the ocean and bluffs. The neighbors were Lloyd McAdams and Heather Baines. One of the great benefits of the Marquez Knolls area is the incredible ocean views that are provided to most homes. The CC&Rs that the developers (the Lachman brothers) recorded in 1963, before they began selling the individual lots, were expressly intended to provide view protection rights. Nevertheless, despite what looks like clear language prohibiting obstruction of views, the trial court (Santa Monica Superior Court) and the Court of Appeal struggled with the interpretation of the Marquez Knolls CC&Rs. The first trial judge in Zabrucky v. McAdams ruled that it was impractical to interpret the CC&Rs as precluding the defendants’ addition because almost every house in the Marquez Knolls area at least partially blocks another house’s ocean view. The Zabruckys appealed that decision, which appeal was supported by the Marquez Knolls Property Owners Association through an amicus curie (friend of the court) brief. In 2005, the Court of Appeal, in a landmark decision, reversed the trial court, ruling that the CC&Rs did restrict additions to houses that obstruct views. But the Court also added the word ‘unreasonably’ to paragraph 11 in the CC&R’s (cited above). The Court then reversed the case back to the Los Angeles Superior Court for retrial to determine whether the defendants’ addition would unreasonably obstruct the Zabruckys’ view. In 2006, the Zabrucky v. McAdams case was retried before a different judge in the West Los Angeles courthouse. According to an expert hired by McAdams, the loss of a view of the bluffs was deemed to have a 10 percent impact on the overall view, whereas the experts for Zabrucky testified to a much greater impact, between one-third and one-half of the ocean view. Many people would think even the 10 percent loss was an ‘unreasonable’ obstruction. But the trial court judge found against the Zabruckys, concluding that the defendants’ obstruction of the Zabruckys’ views was ‘minimal.’ The judge’s finding was based on his conclusion that the addition only affected their view of the meeting of the Palisades bluffs and the ocean, and not of the ocean or the ‘Queen’s Necklace’ (the string of lights along PCH). Apparently, the trial judge believed mixed views of land and water are entitled to less protection than pure ‘ocean’ views. Many Pacific Palisades homeowners are surprised–even shocked–by that interpretation because one of the main aesthetic features of the topography of the Palisades is the mix of ocean, beach, bluffs, canyons and mountains. The Zabruckys are appealing the trial judge’s decision, having filed their opening brief on March. However, this time the Marquez Knolls Property Owners Association declined to file an amicus curie brief. As a result, 18 Marquez Knolls property owners on their own had to file a brief on March 23 in support of an interpretation of the CC&RS that would protect and enforce view rights. The McAdams brief is due by June 4. The oral argument will probably be scheduled for fall, and decisions are usually within 90 days of argument. The Zabruckys’ appeal is basically asking the court to provide some guidance as to what ‘reasonable’ means in the contest of the view rights provided for by the CC&Rs. More specifically, what does ‘unreasonably obstruct the view from any other lot’ mean? The Zabruckys also argue that the expansion of a residence beyond its preexisting footprint in a manner that ‘obstructs’ another’s views should be deemed unreasonable. Elsewhere in the Palisades, entire neighborhoods are in litigation over the view rights provided by their CC&Rs. In Sunset Mesa, a number of ocean-view property owners are seeking to have the CC&Rs there declared to be unenforceable so they can expand their homes beyond the original footprint, to the detriment of their neighbors’ views. In Castellammare and Marquez Knolls, lawsuits are pending to permit or halt construction of houses that threaten to reduce views from neighboring houses. View rights are particularly in danger because many of the older homes, built in the 1960s, are targets for expansion, even if at the expense of other people’s view enjoyment. If the Zabruckys lose their battle, developers and others seeking to build bigger structures will surely use that decision to support their attack on neighboring homeowners’ view rights. The final outcome of the Zabrucky case may affect the character of the Palisades for decades to come. Those who relied on the view protection rights provided by the CC&Rs in purchasing their property and paying a premium for their views should review their legal rights in light of the challenges that the Zabruckys and others are currently battling. Action in support of proponents for view rights, such as the amicus briefs filed in the pending Zabrucky appeal, may help turn the tide in favor of protecting view rights. As to your individual rights, the advice of an attorney specializing in this area is always recommended and crucial. Keith Turner is a Pacific Palisades resident and real estate litigation and title attorney. He is of counsel to the Law Offices of Don Franzen, who is representing several legal cases referred to in this article. Turner is not working on the Zabrucky v. McAdams case.

Ceremony Marks ‘Greening’ of YMCA Parcel

The Palisades-Malibu YMCA held a Community Appreciation Celebration on its parcel of land at the corner of Sunset and Temescal Canyon Road last Sunday. The event honored the people who have led and financed the decades-long campaign to purchase the 3.9-acre property, famous for its pumpkins and Christmas trees. Thanks to a lead pledge of $250,000 from Palisadians Cindy and Bill Simon, the YMCA is prepared to purchase the property and begin landscaping what is now known as Simon Meadow. From left to right are YMCA Board Chairman Duke Ostendorf, Cindy and Bill Simon, and Executive Director Carol Pfannkuche. (An article on the ceremony will appear in next week’s Palisadian-Post.)

Privacy Laws Shroud LAUSD Cop Investigation

Last month, the Los Angeles School Police Department completed its internal investigation into an officer’s use of force during a violent confrontation with teenagers and adults in Pacific Palisades last September. But current state privacy laws prohibit public disclosure of the results of that investigation, angering community members hoping for closure and police oversight. Requests by the Palisadian-Post for the result of the investigation have been repeatedly denied by the Los Angeles Unified School District, whose lawyers cite state statutes that bar disclosure. “I’m outraged that they would not tell us the outcome of the investigation,” said Janet Turner, a Palisades Community Council member. “I thought that we were promised full and open disclosure. How else are we supposed to have a system of checks and balances if it’s not public record?” Turner co-wrote a resolution which was passed unanimously by the council in December that asked LAUSD’s police chief to consider reassigning Officer John Taylor out of the Palisades given community concerns, pending the department’s investigation. But a 2006 California Supreme Court decision has significantly restricted public access to the outcome. In Copley Press Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego, the court further tightened already restrictive public access to police records. Police misconduct hearings that were earlier made public became closed. And officers’ disciplinary records became confidential. The current statute will leave several questions unanswered: What accusations against Taylor were confirmed by police? Was he disciplined? And was corrective action taken? “After seven months of investigation, there is nothing but silence now,” said Bruce Ishimatsu, an attorney and a parent of two students at Palisades Charter High School. “How can we trust the integrity of the process or its results if we are kept in the dark?” Community concerns began when Taylor used pepper spray to arrest two “disobedient” eighth-graders from Paul Revere Charter Middle School near the CVS/Pharmacy’s Swarthmore Avenue loading dock on September 19. A crowd of student and adult bystanders, incensed by the officer’s use of force, were also sprayed at a distance by the officer. A history of excessive-force complaints against the officer further stoked community concerns, culminating in demands for his reassignment. In 2002, a superior officer in the LAUSD police department blocked Taylor’s promotion, citing “a series of excessive-force incidents.” Last week, a civil trial began in federal court alleging that Taylor beat a 15-year-old Crenshaw High student with a baton over her knees. According to LAUSD records in November, the district had spent more than $152,000 in legal expenses to defend Taylor in two known lawsuits. As reported in the Post, Taylor was temporarily assigned in December to a computer training position. This week, LAUSD rejected a records request that would determine the officer’s current assignment, again citing officer privacy statutes. But parents and students say the department assigned him back to his regular position as a patrol officer, where he monitors school safety at public schools in the Palisades and the Westside. School Board President Marlene Canter told the Post on Tuesday that “the board took the incident seriously” and consequently reviewed the department’s use-of-force policy. Board members changed that policy to require that when officers use pepper spray against students that they dispatch medical attention immediately, she said. The board also ordered a study of the department’s large backlog of outstanding internal investigations. As recently as 2004, an officer recommended for dismissal after an investigation could not be fired because the investigation took longer than district law allowed. That study is due within the next two months but will not be a public record. Canter said that when she receives a report of the department’s action on Taylor she will do her “best to share” what she is allowed to share. But the current state law is expected to largely proscribe disclosing the department’s disciplinary actions. Other privacy laws have shielded the Los Angeles School Police Department from criticism and change. A recent multi-million-dollar external audit of LAUSD by Evergreen Solutions recommended sweeping changes for LAUSD but had few suggestions for the police department because it was denied access to district audits of that department. School Board member David Tokofsky said that the police department has traditionally trained officers with a ‘unique sensitivity to students and school issues,’ but management has deteriorated. “In the last few years, there has been a decline in the oversight and the quantity of new recruits,” Tokofsky told the Post. “Broadly speaking, there was an overexuberance to become a police force like the LAPD without the infrastructure and accountability.” Tokofsky believes, however, that these problems can be remedied by the new LAUSD Superintendent, David Brewer, who has promised reform. Meanwhile last week, the LAPD began an investigation into an alleged rape by LAUSD Officer Ian King. According to a district press release, no students were involved and the officer has been placed on paid leave. A former, high-ranking LAUSD police official said that two women filed complaints against King for sexual harassment or misconduct. The officer was reportedly reassigned to downtown schools from University High in 2005 after a female student complained that he asked for a sexual favor. The former official told the Post that an investigation of King lapsed, and he returned to the department to work after an “industrial injury.” LAUSD Chief Operating Officer Dan Isaacs, who oversees the department, said he could not comment on an ongoing investigation. A pending bill in Sacramento, SB 1019, written by State Senator Gloria Romero, could restore public access to police disciplinary records. Proponents of the bill say that it is needed to promote public trust of police departments and provide accountability. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and LAPD Police Chief William J. Bratton have publicly supported the bill, which is expected to be voted on this year. Police officers’ associations, which run a powerful lobby in Sacramento, largely oppose the bill. They argue that it would subject officers to increased risk of retribution, lost credibility, increased civil liability and general embarrassment. State Senator Sheila Kuehl, who represents the Palisades, told the Post this week that she would likely support the bill. State Assemblymember Julia Brownley said on Wednesday she has not read the final bill, but she “weighs on the side of government transparency.” ———– To contact Staff Writer Max Taves, e-mail reporter@palipost.com or call (310) 454-1321 ext. 28.

Dolphins Preschool Reacts to Abrupt Dismissal

By MELISSA BEAL Palisadian-Post Contributor On April 6, following a weeklong break for spring vacation, Margarita Pagliai, co-founder of Seven Arrows Little Dolphins Preschool in Temescal Gateway Park, received an e-mail from the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy stating that the school’s lease had been revoked and that they must vacate the property by the end of June. Pagliai told the Palisadian-Post this week that she was shocked and confused by the Conservancy’s abrupt turnaround from the agreement signed a year ago permitting the school to stay through June 2008. But, by the end of April, the Conservancy re-instated its resolution that provided Little Dolphins with a one-year nonrenewable lease, allowing the preschool to stay until the end of the 2008 academic year. ‘We were shocked,’ Pagliai said, ‘because we had a lease and they revoked that lease, which is what they just renewed.’ When Little Dolphins Preschool was founded in 1994, it entered a two-lease agreement with the Conservancy, followed by back-to-back five-year leases. It occupies approximately 7,000 square feet in the 141-acre park and its most recent lease, which began on September 1, 2002, was set to expire on June 30, 2007. Because of a consistent pattern of renewed lease agreements between the Conservancy and Seven Arrows (the parent of Little Dolphins), school administrators expected their lease to be renewed. Over the past 12-year lease period, Seven Arrows has paid $609,913 to the Conservancy and has also spent approximately $600,000 on improvements to the school bungalows and adjacent Stewart Hall, according to school officials. In May 2006, Seven Arrows received a letter from the Conservancy stating it had begun a process of phasing out private leaseholds in Temescal Gateway Park and the preschool’s lease would not be renewed. Aware of the logistical difficulties in relocating a school, the Conservancy offered Seven Arrows tenancy for one additional year, allowing it to remain in the park until June 2008. ‘Our rent helped enable them (the Conservancy) to run their programs and run the park,’ said Seven Arrows co-founder Jody Roberts. The Conservancy’s decision to terminate all private leases in the park is part of its plan to increase public access to the area. ‘Dozens of people have walked by Little Dolphins and wanted to use the facility,’ said Joe Edmiston, executive director of the SMMC. ‘But of course they can’t, because it is gated off and private, to be used only by Little Dolphins.’ However, Seven Arrows–which has hosted and funded several public programs, including an event featuring renowned primatologist Jane Goodall that drew hundreds of LAUSD children to the park–maintains that their space is of no use to the Conservancy. ‘These bungalows are not in conflict with the space they need for their programs,’ Pagliai said. ‘They always told us that our location was not what they needed for their programs.’ The Conservancy’s Mountains Education Program provides outdoor education for inner-city children, which includes overnight stays in the cabins and dormitories in the canyon. Seven Arrows administrators have now begun the process of finding a new location for their preschool. Still, they estimate that the relocation could take up to three years, considering that they must find a space, then complete the permitting and licensing process. Also, it will be difficult to extend contracts for teachers and accept new and returning students to their program if they are unsure where or if the school will be in operation by the start of school in 2008. ‘Families need to know that there is a location, where the school is going to be, and that it is going to exist,’ co-founder Mari-Jo Deutschman said. ‘We are in the process of looking for space, but it’s not an easy task. We feel that one year won’t work. Our school will not be able to exist logistically.’ In the meantime, Seven Arrows hopes to continue working with the Conservancy, coexisting with any of its programs in the park, as they have done in the past. ‘We are willing and wanting to be partners with them,’ Roberts said. ‘We no longer see ourselves having a long-term future here, but if we have a reasonable amount of time to find a new location, we would like to use that time in partnership with the Conservancy.’

PaliHi Abandons Calendar Change

School officials announced Tuesday that next year’s academic calendar at Palisades Charter High School will not change, ending a controversial proposal that divided the administration and students, teachers and parents. ‘We have been reviewing and studying this matter in recent months and have concluded that there will be no calendar change for next year as proposed,’ said administrators and the UTLA in a joint press release. ‘Together, we will continue to review this and other issues with the purpose of doing what is best for our students.’ If the change had been approved, classes in the 2007-2008 school year would have begun on August 20 and ended June 6, rather than beginning in early September and ending in late June. Also, the first semester would have ended before winter break, rather than ending weeks after that break. The school announced the change after its latest round of negotiations with UTLA, the union which represents nearly all of the school’s teachers. The calendar change became a contentious point in negotiations. A union vote in December revealed that the faculty was evenly divided about the change. But in an April vote, teachers overwhelmingly opposed the change. Polls conducted by the school last fall showed majorities of parents and students opposing the change. The PaliHi Board passed the change with the expectation that an extra three weeks of instruction time before Advanced Placement tests and an earlier first semester final would benefit students academically. But opponents of the change said that it would conflict with the academic calendars of all other local public schools, jeopardizing families’ winter and summer plans. Some were also concerned with possible schedule conflicts for school sports. ‘I think the democratic process has been served,’ said Bud Kling, chairman of the school’s board and a longtime teacher. ‘All three stakeholders voted against it. To override that would have been a grave mistake. But I pity all those poor parents that changed their summer vacations!’ Despite the resolution of the calendar change, UTLA and PaliHi have not finished contract talks. The two sides will meet next week to complete negotiations. ———– To contact Staff Writer Max Taves, e-mail reporter@palipost.com or call (310) 454-1321 ext. 28.

Ms. A Gets an A+ From Students, Judges

Palisades Charter Elementary teacher Tonya Angeletopoulos
Palisades Charter Elementary teacher Tonya Angeletopoulos
Photo by Rich Schmitt, Staff Photographer

Chosen as one of the five teachers to receive the 2007 Lori Petrick Award, Tonya Angeletopoulos is also a winner with her fifth grade students, who call her ‘Ms. A.’ During Teacher Appreciation Week, Angeletopoulos’ students surprised her with a book that included drawings of her as well as comments. A typical sentiment was expressed by Zoe Arrastia-Prince, who wrote: ‘She makes learning fun. She helps us individually. She is not only a teacher, but also a friend. She makes her students excited to go to school.’ Ms. A. has been teaching for seven years, all at Palisades Charter Elementary. She began with a kindergarten/first grade class, and although she admits it was challenging, she already had the makings of a veteran teacher because even then she knew, ‘You can try to teach the whole class but you have to remember to teach each individual.’ Angeletopoulos taught fourth grade the next five years, then moved to fifth grade last year. ‘I feel that the students put together everything they know when they get in fifth,’ she said. ‘They’re going through so many changes, it’s a great age for discussion. They have such an interest they create their own learning.’ Although many people would agree that optimal learning is student created, it’s actually a good teacher who is able to facilitate and guide that process. Ms. A. gave her students a Native American project in which each student taught the class a skill or craft associated with the tribe researched. She assigned each student an area of the country and the students chose the tribe they wanted to research: the tribe’s clothing, food, shelters and culture. ‘The kids were motivated because everything came from them,’ Angeletopoulos said. Currently, the students are working in groups to produce colonial newspapers using a few guidelines from Ms. A., but choosing their own stories. So far the results are interesting and fun, including trivia like ‘What did the colonists wear when they boarded the ship for the Boston Tea Party?’ Ms. A. feels that children will learn and remember important data if they have a stake in it. ‘They need to feel it and know it to learn it,’ she said. She still remembers one of her elementary teachers who made each child feel unique for who they were. That teacher did a lot of hands-on projects: she wasn’t a textbook teacher. Ms. A. takes a similar approach. ‘I try to avoid standing and lecturing,’ she said. For a geometry unit, students designed and are currently constructing three-dimensional paper robots using cubes, cylinders, pyramids and other geometrical shapes. The students first designed a robot on graph paper, transferred their design to construction paper, cut the pieces out and assembled them. One of the teacher guidelines was that the robot had to be more than eight pieces. The result is a classroom of colorful different-shaped and different-sized robots, each as individual as the student who made it. Angeletopoulos grew up in Los Angeles and has two sisters, one an accountant, the other a teacher. Her mother is a teacher and her father, who has retired, worked as a manager for Albertsons. After graduating from University High School, she attended Cal State Northridge, where she received her teaching credential. ‘I think I knew when I was young, I wanted to be a teacher,’ she said. ‘When I am with kids and teaching, I’m at my best.’ Another aspect of teaching that Ms. A likes is that it encompasses so many areas, from the creative to working with people to constantly educating herself as well as her students. ‘Teaching is motivating and stimulating for an adult,’ she noted. For the past 11 summers, Angeletopoulos has run the Rustic Canyon summer camp with Jake Medway. They have a staff of 30 and work with 200 kids every three weeks. When she has spare time she hikes in Temescal, jogs (she recently ran a half marathon in Huntington Beach) and takes an occasional yoga class. Even though she spends a lot of time with family and friends, ‘most of my time is dedicated to teaching,’ she said.

Calendar for the Week of May 10

THURSDAY, MAY 10 Pacific Palisades Community Council meeting, 7 p.m., Palisades Branch Library, 861 Alma Real. Public invited. Palisades High grad Harry Medved discusses and signs ‘Hollywood Escapes: The Moviegoer’s Guide to Exploring Southern California’s Great Outdoors,’ 7:30 p.m., Village Books on Swarthmore. FRIDAY, MAY 11 Campfire program in Temescal Canyon features the life of the chaparral, 7 p.m. in the campfire center by the dining hall in Temescal Gateway Park, 15601 Sunset. Parking is $5. Contact: (310) 454-1395 ext. Theatre Palisades production of ‘The Hot L Baltimore,’ at Pierson Playhouse, 941 Temescal Canyon Rd. Performances continue Friday and Saturday evenings at 8 p.m. and Sundays at 2 p.m., through May 13. For tickets, call 454-1970. SATURDAY, MAY 12 The Notre Dame Concert Band, the oldest band in continuous existence in the United States, will present a free concert, 3 p.m. in the auditorium at Paul Revere Middle School, 1450 Allenford, TUESDAY, MAY 15 Registration for the 2007-2008 school year at Corpus Christi School, 6 to 8 p.m. today and 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. on May 16 in the Parish Hall. The kindergarten class will be divided into two classrooms this year, with a maximum student-teacher ratio of 9 to 1. Tuesday Night Hikes with the Temescal Canyon Association begin a new season tonight with an exploration of less-traveled trails in Temescal Canyon. Meet at 6 p.m. in the Temescal Gateway parking lot. Please, no dogs. Expect to be back between 8 and 9 p.m. Contact: temcanyon.org. The free Chautauqua series presents ‘Tracking Topanga’s Terrific Turtles,’ 7:30 p.m. in the dining hall at Temescal Gateway Park, 15601 Sunset. Rosi Dagit, a conservation biologist, will discuss the Southwestern Pond turtles in Topanga. The public is invited. Parking is $5. Contact: (310) 454-1395 ext.106 or visit www.LAMountains.com. Pacific Palisades Historical Society hosts historian and author Roger McGrath, who will offer his recollections of Pacific Palisades, 7:30 p.m. at Pierson Playhouse, 941 Temescal Canyon Rd. (See story, page 12.) Professional orchid grower Fred Clarke will speak about the queen of Venezuelan cattleyas at the monthly meeting of the Malibu Orchid Society, 7:30 p.m. in the Woman’s Club, 901 Haverford. The public is invited. THURSDAY, MAY 17 Educational consultant Gail Meyer will offer her thoughts on navigating the college admission process, 6:30 p.m. at the Palisades Branch Library, 861 Alma Real. The lecture is free and open to the public. Chamber of Commerce Mixer, hosted by ‘Dr. Luke’ of Innate Chiropractic, 5:30 to 7:30 p.m., 16624 Marquez Ave. The public is invited. Fourth annual Pacific Palisades Film Festival, presented by Friends of Film, from tonight at 7 p.m. through May 19 at Pierson Playhouse, 941 Temescal Canyon Rd. (See story, page 12.) Steven Ross, chairman of the history department at USC, will dispute the current understanding of World War II as the ‘Good War’ in a lecture at 7:30 p.m. in the Villa Aurora. The lecture is $10 per person. RSVP: (310) 573-3603. Shuttle service starts at 7 p.m. at Los Liones Drive off Sunset. Mark Frost discusses and signs ‘The Second Objective,’ 7:30 p.m., Village Books on Swarthmore. Using World War II’s Battle of the Bulge as background, Frost spins real life and fictional characters into thriller gold.

Wilma Tauxe, 53-Year Resident

Wilma Tauxe, a kind, resilient woman who had lived in Pacific Palisades for 53 years, passed away on February 3. She was 93. Born in Los Angeles, Wilma Louise Hollins was raised in Glendale. After graduating from junior college and business school, she worked for a real estate developer. She met George Tauxe in an English literature class and their first date was at a Science Club party at the home of Bob Wein, who later founded Bob’s Big Boy. The Tauxes were married on August 29, 1936. George was an electrical engineer, and as he pursued advanced degrees (Cornell, Wisconsin and UCLA)’plus time in the Navy’the Tauxes moved a lot. They came to the Palisades in 1954 and remained in the same house on Friends Street until Wilma’s death. Many people knew Wilma from her daily two-mile walk around the neighborhood. Still more knew her from her commitment to the Methodist Church and P.E.O., where she was always involved in charitable activities such as making sandwiches for the homeless, crafting items for the annual church bazaar, baking pies, and contributing her time and energy in many other ways. Soft-spoken and unassuming, with loving traits and modesty, Wilma left a quiet but enduring mark on the community. About 1960, Wilma became a teacher at the Methodist Church Preschool, a job she enjoyed for 18 years. Through that time and after her retirement, she kept in touch with her students and their families, sharing experiences as the young children she taught became adults, embarked on their careers, and had children of their own. She remained proud of those students, and into her nineties could still point at a house in the Palisades and tell the story of the student who used to live there’this one was now traveling the world, that one was a successful doctor. Wilma and George were very proud of their two sons, George Willis and John Gregory, but lost both to early deaths in 1992 and 1993. Though George, Jr. died suddenly of unexpected heart failure, Greg suffered from degenerative multiple sclerosis and slowly declined over many years. Through those years, he lived with George and Wilma, and Wilma was his complete caregiver, selflessly devoting her full time to his care. In the years that followed, Wilma turned her caregiving attentions to her husband as his health declined following open-heart surgery. George passed away on July 9, 2006, just short of the couple’s 70th wedding anniversary. Wilma is survived by their two grandchildren: Lianne Tauxe, now of Pacific Palisades, and John Hagen of Renton, Washington. A memorial service will be held at 11:45 a.m. on Sunday, May 20, at the Methodist Church, 801 Via de la Paz. Donations in her memory may be made to the church choir.