By LILY TINOCO | Assistant Editor
The Planning and Land Use Management Committee considered a report at a May 27 hearing from West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission and an appeal filed by the Castellammare Mesa Homeowners Association, which challenged the approval of the environment clearance and a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the “large-scale development” of four homes in Castellammare, recommending to grant the appeal and remand the environmental analysis to WLAAPC.
The project would take the space of 12 existing lots along the 17500 blocks of Tramonto and Revello drives at the top of the Tramonto landslide, ranging from 2,619 square feet to 7,695 square feet (each with 2,428 to 6,292 square feet of basement space), as well as a 200-foot extension of Revello Drive. It has been the subject of several community meetings, including Pacific Palisades Community Council.
“Local residents, many of whom lost their homes in the January 7 fire, and [the] Homeowners Association, have long opposed the development on safety grounds,” Castellammare Mesa Homeowners Association said in a statement. “Last year the Los Angeles Westside Planning Commission approved the project, despite the fire code waiver, but as Kimberly Feder, president of the Homeowner’s Association, said, ‘Circumstances have changed and we hope the City Council will correct course.’”
Castellammare Mesa Homeowners Association voiced its concerns, explaining that the project—if approved—would exempt the developer from complying with the Los Angeles Municipal Fire Code and could hinder first responders’ access to a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.
“As proposed, the only way in and out of the development will be a winding road that narrows to 12 [feet] four [inches], not enough to allow two small cars to pass each other, let alone fire trucks,” the statement continued. “This sets a dangerous precedent for future development in Pacific Palisades by waiving fire safety code for new developments.”
Castellammare Mesa Homeowners Association also expressed concern over the sites of the proposed development project being built within the Tramonto landslide.
During the May 27 meeting, Councilmember Traci Park provided an overview of the Palisades as it stands, as well as comments in support of granting the appeal. Park explained to the PLUM Committee that in the aftermath of the January 7 Palisades fire, the Castellammare neighborhood lost 48% of its homes, and is home to the Tramonto landslide, “the city’s most active and well-documented.” A landslide occurred in February 2024, which blocked the right lane of Pacific Coast Highway.
“Over the last several months, we saw major flooding and mud and debris flow, as well as active landslide activity,” Park said. “We’re continuing to struggle to move heavy trucks and equipment on very tiny, narrow, windy roads … The fire’s destruction did not spare infrastructure. We have damaged roads, bulkheads, water lines and drainage systems. I believe a Mitigated Negative Declaration is inadequate for this proposed development, and that a site-specific Environmental Impact Report is needed to study the unique or particular conditions to this site on a very active landslide area, being located in the Pacific Palisades burn area. I believe that the appeal should be granted and the matter should be remanded back to the West LA Area Planning Commission.”
A number of Castellammare residents followed Park, echoing her concerns to the PLUM Committee, expressing an urgency for a site-specific EIR to protect the future of the neighborhood.
“I am very moved by the concerns about the NMD being done prior to the fire and the landslide issues … are very serious,” a board member said after listening to public comments.
The PLUM Committee then recommended to grant the appeal and remand the environmental analysis to the WLAAPC.
The applicant, Demos Development, was called during the meeting. Neither the applicant nor their representatives, Greg Demos and Tony Russo (Crest Real Estate), stepped forward to speak.
The matter was then submitted to the Los Angeles City Council for consideration, and the City Clerk scheduled the item to be discussed on June 4. LA City Council voted to adopt the PLUM Committee’s report. As directed by the City Council, the applicant will need to file a new application for environmental review.